hnalogo.jpg (103481 bytes)

 

Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society

 

Home
Up
150-Day ORS Standards
JO PO Pattern & Practice Of Neglect For 150-Day Rule
Mandamus Proceedings For 150-Day Violations
Appellant Court Opinions On Attorney Fees From 150-Day Proceedings
Chilling Effect On Citizen Involvement From Violation of 150-Day Rule
Possible Citizen-Initiated Enforcement Order
Corrective Actions For 150-Day Violations

 

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR 150-DAY RULE VIOLATIONS

December 5, 2006

Land Use Committee
Hugo Neighborhood Association
Members of the CAC/NA Coalition

Enforcement Order ORS 197.335 & OAR 660-045

Issue. The issue is the chilling effect on citizen participation from JO CO’s violation of the 150-day rule (ORS 215.427), and a mandamus process (ORS 215.429) that may follow from the failure, to move the land use process out of the jurisdiction of the JO CO Board of Commissioners (BCC) to the local circuit court, and the award of attorney fees (ORS 20.075(1)) against intervenors (i.e., citizens).

Citizen-Initiated Enforcement Order. The Hugo Neighborhood Land Use Committee is considering a citizen-initiated enforcement order process established by Oregon Administrative Rules Division 45, Citizen-Initiated Enforcement Orders (OAR 660-045-0040). The Hugo Land Use Committee believes that Josephine County (JO CO) has engaged and continues to engage in numerous "patterns or practices" violating ORS 215.427, administrative rules, case law, and its own comprehensive plan and development code.1 ORS 197.319 to 197.335.

Corrective Actions ORS 197.335(1)(c) & OAR 660-045-0040(3)(e)

Corrective action means an action sought by a requester or required of an affected local government (i.e., JO CO) or district by an enforcement order under ORS 197.335(1)(c). The term includes revisions to an affected local government or district's comprehensive plan, land use regulations, special district cooperative agreement, urban service agreement, or decision-making process. A corrective action is the remedy for the noncompliance specified by an enforcement order. The following corrective actions are recommended for consideration by the BCC to correct the pattern and practice of violating the 150-day rule.

1. Require county to keep track of the 150-Day clock and be responsible for meeting the deadlines. Assigned planners are responsible for a 150-Day enforcement schedule - failure to meet schedule is a work performance concern.
2. Implement a short deadline from the day of oral decision (i.e., 14 days) for the applicant to submit final written findings for signature by the hearing body.
3. Require county to return appeal fees for a scheduled appeal meeting before the BCC that did not occur because of the BCC’s failure to comply with the 150-day rule (ORS 215.427).
4. Require the county to pay any attorney fees resulting from a mandamus process which moves the land use process out of the jurisdiction of the JO CO BCC to the circuit court, regardless of whether, or not, there are citizen intervenors . State ex rel Aspen Group v. Washington County, 166 Or App 217, 996 P2d 1032 (2000).

More Information

Corrective Actions Identified By County Planning.2

Current and advanced planning in JO CO are state mandates (ORS197 & ORS 215) where county must follow approved land use ordinances. Identified corrective actions include the following.

. Enforcement Order.
. Withhold State Grant Monies, Shared Revenues, and Loans.
. Declare Development Moratorium.
. State Take over County Land Use Program.

Effective corrective actions will remove the pattern and practice of JO CO exceeding the 150-Day rule and violating the law. It will also remove the success rate of citizen-initiated enforcement orders.

More Information. This brochure is one of 11 brochures in the Hugo Neighborhood’s education series on 150-Day Violations. Would you like to learn more? Contact a member of the Land Use Committee of the Hugo Neighborhood.

Disclaimer. This brochure is as much about providing information and provoking questions as it is about opinions concerning the adequacy of findings of fact and land use decisions. It does not provide recommendations to citizens and it is not legal advice. It does not take the place of a lawyer. If citizens use information contained in this paper, it is their personal responsibility to make sure that the facts and general information contained in it are applicable to their situation.

1. Hugo Land Use Committee. 2006. Possible Citizen-Initiated Enforcement Order Based On 150-Day rule Pattern & Practice Violations. Hugo, OR.
2. Minutes From Josephine County Adopted Budget FY 2006-07, June 21, 2006; Minutes And Exhibits From Budget Committee Hearing FY 2002 - 2003, May 7, 2003.
3. Hugo Land Use Committee. 2006. 150-Day ORS Standards.  Hugo, OR.

Back to Top

@ 2010 Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society