Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society |
|
COMMON
LAND USE ISSUES & PROBLEMS Land Use Committee The Framework For Citizen
Involvement Ultimately, the responsibility for any citizen involvement program lies with the local governing body (i.e., the city council, board of county commissioners, or county court). The governing body, however, usually delegates that responsibility to several organizations: the local planning department, the planning commission, a variety of committees and the advisory group known as the Committee for Citizen Involvement (CCI). That is exactly what happened in Josephine County where the CCI is the Josephine County CIC with one hat and the Josephine County Rural Planning Commission with another hat. Common CI Issues &
Problems Such complaints are common in Josephine
County. Sometimes they are justified, sometimes not. Either way, they offer dramatic
evidence that CI in land use planning often is controversial. The main issues in the
county that underlie such controversy are described in this brochure series: Common
Citizen Involvement Issues & Problems in Oregon: 2006. Every CI program is likely to
encounter them. One through ten of following CI issues and
problems are common statewide as identified by the Oregon CIAC.2 Issue 11 was identified
by the Hugo Land Use Committee. Oregon Citizen Involvement
Advisory Committee (CIAC) . CIAC is to develop a program for the commission that promotes and enhances public participation in the adoption and amendment of the goals and guidelines. . Each local government shall submit to the CIAC on a periodic basis, a program for CI in preparing, adopting and amending comprehensive plans and lands use regulations within the respective city and county. Such program shall at least contain provision for a citizen advisory committee (CAC) or committees broadly representative of geographic areas and of interests relating to land uses and land use decisions. . The CIAC shall review the proposed programs submitted by each city and county and report to the LCDC whether or not the proposed program adequately provides for public involvement in the planning process, and, if it does not so provide, in what respects it is inadequate. Disclaimer. This brochure is as much about providing information and provoking questions as it is about opinions concerning the adequacy of findings of fact and land use decisions. It does not provide recommendations to citizens and it is not legal advice. It does not take the place of a lawyer. If citizens use information contained in this paper, it is their personal responsibility to make sure that the facts and general information contained in it are applicable to their situation.
|
@ 2010 Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society |